Gemi Grade Report

Espeon VMAX

Evolving Skies

Gemi 970% confidence

Evolving Skies65Pokémon

1views

Compare community scans of this card →

Scanned with GemiScan

Grade your own cards free.

@earl

Published September 7, 2026

Card Info

Set: swsh7
Number: 65
Illustrator: 5ban Graphics

Grading Summary

Confidence

70%

This Espeon VMAX presents as a very strong copy overall, led by excellent corners and surface with only minor edge wear and slight front centering offset. The scan evidence supports a clean high-grade appearance, with a few tiny defects that do not materially detract from the card.

Flags

Image Quality

Glare

• Parts of this scan are hard to inspect. Glare, overexposure, or low detail may reduce grading confidence.

• Strong lighting reflection and hotspot across the foil surface, especially near the top right and center, which can interfere with inspection.

Defect Detected In Affected Region

2 back-side defects ignored due to scan quality.

moderate

Subgrades

Grade Shape

Four-axis score profile

0-10

Centering

9.0

The card shows solid overall alignment, with the front measuring slightly heavier on the left and top and the back landing close to balanced. The front tilt is noticeable on measurement but still comfortably within strong collector-grade centering.

Corners

10.0

Corner wear is extremely light overall, limited to a tiny speck/possible nick at the front top-right and a faint touch of whitening near the back top-left. One back-corner observation came from an image-quality affected area, so the visible wear remains too subtle and inconsistent to pull the corners away from a pristine result.

Observed

Edges

9.0

The edges are largely clean, with the main observed issue being a tiny white nick on the back bottom edge near the right side. That isolated minor wear fits a strong but not flawless edge result.

Observed

Surface

10.0

Surface inspection shows only tiny spots: a small dark speck on the back near the yellow 'P' and another faint speck in a lower back region, with one of the back-side observations excluded because the scan quality there was unreliable. With no meaningful scratches, dents, creases, or foil wear visible, the surface remains effectively clean.

Observed