Gemi Grade Report
Holon Phantoms
Published August 15, 2026
Centering, corners, and edges all present extremely well, with no measurable wear in those categories. The card’s grade is mainly limited by moderate front surface foil wear and a small speck visible in the art/text area.
Image Quality
• Parts of this scan are hard to inspect. Glare, overexposure, or low detail may reduce grading confidence.
• Parts of this scan are hard to inspect. Glare, overexposure, or low detail may reduce grading confidence.
Grade Shape
Four-axis score profile
Measured centering is essentially perfect on both sides, with the front reading almost exactly 51/49 left-right and 50/50 top-bottom, and the back still landing very close to balanced. That level of placement supports the top centering result.
No corner wear was detected on either front or back corners, so the card presents as sharp and clean at all four corners. The top corner result is consistent with the scan evidence.
Edge scans found no edge wear on the front or back, with no chipping, whitening, or other perimeter damage detected along the strips. That supports a pristine edge result.
Surface quality is held down by several moderate foil-wear areas on the front, including rubbed whitening along the upper-left border, lower-left border, and a vertical worn strip on the mid-right border, plus a tiny dark speck in the text box. Minor glare on both sides makes parts of the scan harder to inspect, but the visible surface wear is substantial enough to justify the low surface result.
Observed
Surface (4.0) is the lowest of the four axes. It's the main thing keeping this card from a higher grade.
The limiting defect is Surface Foil Wear (moderate, front).
Bringing surface up to the level of the next-weakest axis (Centering, 10.0) would be the single biggest improvement available.
Verified
Rayquaza δ
ex13 · 26