Gemi Grade Report
Hidden Fates
Published June 21, 2026
This Jessie & James card presents strong centering and surface quality, with corners that show moderate wear and edges that are the clearest weakness. Back-side scan quality is a little uneven, but the visible defects are still enough to support a firm narrative.
Image Quality
2 back-side defects ignored due to scan quality.
Parts of this scan are hard to inspect. Glare, overexposure, or low detail may reduce grading confidence.
Grade Shape
Four-axis score profile
The card is well centered overall. Front centering is nearly balanced both left/right and top/bottom, and the back shows only a mild shift that still supports a top-tier centering result.
Corner quality is solid but not pristine, with moderate wear at the back bottom-left and top-left corners, plus a tiny nick at the top-right. A back bottom-right issue was observed in a lower-quality area and was excluded from scoring, so the result reflects the clearer corner evidence.
Observed
Edge condition is the main limitation, especially on the back where several small white nicks and whitening spots run along the cut edge, including a more noticeable cluster near the bottom segment. One additional edge cluster was visible in an image-quality-affected region and was excluded from scoring, but the remaining edge wear still justifies a noticeably reduced result.
Observed
Surface is largely clean, with only a small brown speck on the back blue background near the right side. No meaningful front surface damage is evident from the scan, so the surface remains strong overall.
Observed
Edges (5.0) is the lowest of the four axes. It's the main thing keeping this card from a higher grade.
The limiting defect is Edge Wear (moderate, back).
Bringing edges up to the level of the next-weakest axis (Corners, 7.0) would be the single biggest improvement available.
Verified
Jessie & James
sm115 · 68